Jeff Turner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:34:04AM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:

Hi!

I can confirm that the new cache implementation is a little buggy. I was
the last 5 days trying to make run my application (that is already tested)
in the lastest CVS.

I am another error with the new cache interface. I dont know where is the
problem. Throw an exception about some UnnamedSelector:

ERROR   (2003-01-14) 17:12.17:171   [core.manager] (/myapp/aut-inicio)

Thread-7/ExcaliburComponentSelector: UnnamedSelector: ComponentSelector
Attempted to retrieve component with null hint.

Oh.. I was getting those errors too :)  I found it was because my sitemap used
'map:pipelines' inside map:components, and the syntax recently changed to
'map:pipes':

<map:components>
  ...
  <map:pipes default="caching">
     <map:pipe name="caching" src="org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.CachingProcessingPipeline"/>
     <map:pipe name="noncaching" src="org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.NonCachingProcessingPipeline"/>
  </map:pipes>
</map:components>

Erm.  Shouldn't the sitemap version be incremented for large
backwards-incompatible changes like this?
no, because these things were never released anyway.

Users are NOT going to be amused
when all their sitemaps break with such an unhelpful message..
Read the WARNING.txt file on the xml-cocoon2 CVS module.

Once we exit alpha stage, those things won't change, but now it's hard enough to come up with a serious design without having to back-support anything that gets tried out.

The reason why we don't release anything right now is *exactly* to prevent those issues and protect our users.

Besides, we had a vote on that change that passed and you didn't vote -1 on it. I think it's very unfair to complain on it afterwards.

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to