On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Well, I didn't vote "-1" to a release. I just said that I considered it > somewhat premature to release something in the middle of a design > discussion.
Fair comment. I was hoping the discussion would be over before the alpha. > I'm not stopping anybody from releasing, but I want to be perfectly > clear that I won't personally consider making *any* single effort for > back-compatibility until we reach beta state. I don't think anyone would suggest back-compatibility for an alpha: but an alpha will hopefully get us on the road to a beta, and I'd love to see 2.1 released as "stable" in the next 6 months or so (it's hard to convince people that using the CVS version is safe). > I feel that everybody who should be interested in an alpha version has > enough CVS knowledge to know how to get it. Time for me to start submitting bug reports I guess :-) Andrew. -- Andrew Savory Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managing Director Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658 Luminas Internet Applications Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135 This is not an official statement or order. Web: www.luminas.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
