On 2/2/03 10:47 am, "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >> Timothy Larson wrote: >> >>> Any chance snapshots of the CVS 2.0.5-dev could be made >>> just like the snapshots of CVS HEAD so mere mortals such >>> as myself could get easy access to the fixes going into stable >>> branch? >>> >> >> Here it is, for temporary consumption: >> http://www.apache.org/~vgritsenko/xml-cocoon-205-dev-20030201.tar.gz > > > This makes me think : aren't branches in our CVS upside down ? I mean it > would be better if the stable branch (2.0.5-dev) was HEAD and the > development of the future version (2.1) occured in a separate branch. It depends on what you want to do, "branch out" old releases and let their branch "die" slowly, or "branch in" (merge) new ones when they become mainstream.... (for example, if we think about branch-ins when 2.1 becomes "main version" we'll have to merge it back into head)... Personally, I prefer "branching out" old releases... But anyway when subversion will come, there's not going to be this problem anymore :-) Pier --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
