Jeff Turner wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:22:26PM +0000, Pier Fumagalli wrote:We also have to take into account the future subprojects of the Cocoon top-level project. In this perspective, the current Cocoon should be considered as the "core" of a group of related projects (CMS, GIS, webapp, etc.)
"Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Turner wrote:So? What names do you guys propose?
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 04:53:01PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:Totally agreed on the naming part.
What about:That would be a severe break with tradition in Jakarta and xml.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
projects. IMO, consistency within Apache (particularly the Java-speaking
parts) is more important than saving a few characters in the list name.
IMO, whatever Ant and Avalon pick. +1 for switching to whatever (user@ and dev@ sounds good) when they agree to switch too.How about sending round a mail to gain consensus? There are some tricky issues (users@ vs. user@, cvs@ vs. commits@).
In that perspective, I don't like stripping the distinctive part of mailing lists for a generic "dev@" if there is to be some "xxx-dev@" in the future.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
