05-Feb-03 14:43:10, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gernot Koller wrote: >>> 04-Feb-03 05:01:59, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Pier Fumagalli wrote: >>>> >>>>> Y'all... Should we do a double fix to both Cocoon and Jetty at the same >>>>> time? >>>>> >>>> If this is in regards to redirects... I think consensus is to implement >>>> servlet spec in Cocoon, and don't rely on (buggy) engines like >>>> websphere. It means, in HttpEnvironment sendRedirect method make >>>> conversion from relative to absolute URLs. >>> >>> Ignoring, that Cocoon might then not run on engines like websphere ?? >> >> Should read: Ensuring that Cocoon will then work on engines like >> websphere (and unpatched jetyy). > >Should mean: why in the friggin' world can't I _submit_ a patch to the >WebSphere (or name your own commercial engine) when things are broken as I >can do it with Tomcat/Jetty/Resin (name your own open-source engine)...
Well, I can. Hm, ok, not directly a patch, but representing a rather large company in this matter and being officially involved in WebSphere 5.0EE Beta Testing Program I definitly can submit a Bug-Report. And documenting that the bug violates the J2EE Spec, I doubt that the Bug-Report will be ignored. All I need is some runnable lines of code reproducing the bug and documenting why we think this breaks the spec... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
