Vadim Gritsenko wrote, On 11/02/2003 16.27:
Not really. Gump came out of Alexandria. It exports whichever results/reports (the "javadocs") the build asks for.Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:Vadim Gritsenko wrote, On 11/02/2003 14.19:Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:...How about that: "Alexandria = implementation of Forrest + javasrc + javadoc for Jakarta/XML/..."?What about Alexandria as a home for that too? Alexandria=info about projects (docs and stats)
Also, I've seen that Gump generates javadoc too... Overlap?
So if Alexandria were to create the integrated sites you talk about, it should gather the Gump results, the Gump builds, the ForrestBot executions and generate extra reports.
Seems cool!
For some reason I though that this belongs to forrest... BTW, what's differences are between alexandria and forrest?Apart from the fact that Alexandria is dead and Forrest alive? ;-)
Alexanria is about generating infos about project code, Forrest for making the site.
I also asked if it made sense to put the code-insight stuff in Forrest, but it was not well seen. I understand that we prefer to concentrate on the core Forrest stuff, which is sites.
That's why Alexandria is not off my radar. And that's why it makes conceptual sense to do it there.
You are the only one working on it now, so moving it to Alexandria from nowhere will not kill it. And I doubt that we can have correct support from the Forrest team that seems more concentrated on the site stuff.
BTW, there is a new site for Alexandria in CVS, courtesy of Forrest ;-)
I went through it. Not much ;-)
That's an understatement ;-)
Dunno, just possibilities.I'll think about it
Ok. :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
