Pier Fumagalli wrote:
"Scherler, Thorsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


What do you mean? I guess Jetty is faster, more liable (you can bank on
it),....

You'll see this weekend... I don't want to spoil the conference...


...and maybe with Jetty Stefano will be happier
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.cocoon.devel/11982)

He is already happy :-) Ok, let's make this ~kinda~ public... Stefano's
ranting because he has to build a website <http://www.ormaz.it> (his dad's
company, you can guess from the website name orMAZ... Now, this site is
going to be fully cocoon-based, and I'm going to be hosting it on my
hardware as a favour to his dad (who's a great guy), and it is currently
running on Jetty 4.2.7...

Now, I believe that what Stefano is stressed out ATM is the fact that "build
run" doesn't set up something properly for web continuations (the flow), but
that's a minor issue involving the build script, when Cocoon is deployed on
Jetty "normally", web continuations work just beautifully...
Yes, apparently Jetty has a problem with the classloading of resources if they don't belong to teh /web-inf/lib but to the /web-inf/classes.

The same old tune: if a servlet engine can run Cocoon, it can run anything else :) The opposite is, unfortunatley, not true.

Now back to refactoring the build system (almost there)

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham]
--------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to