Re: The new build system (JDK 1.3.1/macosx issues)

[Stefano Mazzocchi]

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

Le Jeudi, 20 fév 2003, à 21:44 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit  :

The new build system has landed on CVS.

woooh-hooh-hooh, looks great!

thank you.

I have a few issues here however, most probably related to my JDK (1.3.1 on macosx 10.2.3).

ok, I'm working on JDK 1.4.1 on win2k so I was expecting something like this.

After a build clean + CVS update (no local.* stuff), build.sh works (1 minute 6 seconds - wow!)

cool

I checked that the target.vm property is correctly set to "1.2" in build.xml.

great

ISSUE 1 - JDBC3 stuff
"build.sh webapp" fails:
src/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/ AbstractEsqlConnection.java:298: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class Savepoint
location: package sql
public java.sql.Savepoint setSavepoint()

Most probably this has to do with the "jdbc3.present" property used by ./src/blocks/databases/build.xml. I tried to set this property in the optional-tests target of the main build.xml but it didn't help.

hmmm, might be a problem with the invocation of the block build. I didn't really test that one since it was working for me. I'll try more stuff.

ISSUE 2 - "build run"
"build.sh run" says "NoClassDefFoundError: org/xml/sax/ContentHandler" unless I add this to the classpath of the run target:

<fileset dir="lib/endorsed">
<include name="*.jar"/>
</fileset>

Oh, damn, you're totally right. Since JDK 1.3.x doesn't have the -endorsed command line tag, jetty doesn't find things.

I'm installing JDK 1.3.1 so that I can see these problems myself.

Using the <classpath> from the build.old.xml, the "run" target works as well (that is, jetty starts but as I have no webapp it doesn't go that far).
Also a JDK 1.3.1 issue I think, as this interface is standard in 1.4 AFAIK but not in 1.3.1.

Yes, it's trivial to fix, but I'll install JDK 1.3.1 so that I can do stuff myself.

Thanks and keep up reporting the problems.

--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham]
--------------------------------------------------------------------