Matthew Langham wrote:
At the same time, Cocoon 2.1-dev has to reach beta state ASAP since we
are nearly feature complete and our internal cleanups and refactoring
are working very well. [in a followup I will outline what's missing
before release]



Just to add slightly to this from my area - there are quite a few large
companies using 2.1-dev (and happy with it). However they are having major
problems both internally (inside their corporations) and externally (being
able to announce publically that they are using Cocoon) because of the fact
that 2.1-dev is not at least beta.

The longer this takes - the more likely that this could be damaging to
commercial adoption of Cocoon.

Yep.


Let's roll up our sleeves and do it.

Executive summary for release schedule coming up next.

--
Stefano Mazzocchi                               <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham]
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Reply via email to