David Crossley wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > <snip/> > > > > > > Why in the "init"? ... because it should fail straight away > > > if there are problems with the main config. Should that be > > > moved to another early build target? > > > > > The problem with "init" is, that it is executed for any target, > > so even if you make a "build clean", init is executed and this > > then tries to validate. Yesterday I wasn't even able to make > > a "build clean" because of "validation errors". So, I think > > this is the wrong place. > > Thanks, i did not know that. So then targets do not explicitly > need a ... depends="init", like we have now. > They need - sorry, it was a rather short description from me. The "init" is executed for any target, because we have the depends="init" clause for each target as some basic settings like paths and properties are set there.
> I have moved that stuff out of "init" and into "prepare". Great! Thanks, David! Carsten
