Marcus Crafter wrote:
>
>       BTW - I was just about to email you a question regarding
>       CocoonComponentManager.
>
>       The current version extends from ECM, which hardcodes us to
>       that container implementation - do you think it's possible to find
>       another way so we can alleviate this restriction (making it
> easier to
>       move between containers when the time comes) ?
>
Personally, I don't see a real problem with this. If we use a new container,
we change the inheritance from ECM to whatever container we use.
We could also implement a delegation to the real container, but I don't
see a real need for this as changing the container implementation
is due to different feature sets not possible.

Carsten

Reply via email to