Marcus Crafter wrote: > > BTW - I was just about to email you a question regarding > CocoonComponentManager. > > The current version extends from ECM, which hardcodes us to > that container implementation - do you think it's possible to find > another way so we can alleviate this restriction (making it > easier to > move between containers when the time comes) ? > Personally, I don't see a real problem with this. If we use a new container, we change the inheritance from ECM to whatever container we use. We could also implement a delegation to the real container, but I don't see a real need for this as changing the container implementation is due to different feature sets not possible.
Carsten