On Friday 14 March 2003 22:01, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 14/03/2003 14.49: > > But I would like to be able to build cocoon without them and prevent > > people with the ability to use them to solve their problems. Just like > > Carsten wants to do with the flow or XSP. > > That's not the reason IIUC. > Flow adds new dependencies to Cocoon as jars, actions do not. What is > the technical reason why actions have to be able to be removed? > > If you don't want to use them, don't. Since people will be able to > compile with the support in, they will do so, and you will not prevent > them to use actions (nor ATM it's desireable).
Well, if you become a Cocoon hosting service, you may have a different opinion of what other people can do in their sitemaps. Niclas
