On 15/3/03 14:37, "Bernhard Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <snip/> > >> >> I would personally dislike this option because Jelly is rewriting a >> programming language using a markup language syntax, which is, IMHO, a >> very bad thing to do. > > Well, disliking Jelly on the ServerSide I think Jelly-Swing on the > client-side > would be a quite interesting option. > Not using a standard-HTML browser but a Java-Swing-Jelly application > receiving > its UI from Cocoon as Jelly-Swing XML. > I think that would quite interesting, and to some sort quite flexible Small, fast, and does the trick... http://www.mycgiserver.com/~thinlet/ Oh, and it's 28 KB overall! :-) :-) Pier
