On 17/3/03 2:45, "Christopher Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This raises a question... Do we want to keep the IDL sources in line with
>> what's in the implementation (as it is right now) or do we want to work on
>> an abstract model in IDL and then implement it?
>>
>> Maybe it would be a good idea to move everything as of the current
>> implementation in a "cocoon.flow.javascript" module, keep that in sync with
>> the implementation, hack around the "cocoon.flow" module, leaning towards a
>> good design, and make those two models converge.
>>
>> How does it sound? Ideas?
>
> Agree. I wrote the original IDL to reflect exactly what was in CVS. We
> should move that somewhere else and start designing the proper interfaces.
Will do that tomorrow (now that daddy's gone back home!)... Better to get
some sleep now before I forget that Cocoon is written in Java... :-)
Pier
