Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > >> It's already not easy to separate! I can think of how to resolve > >> issue 1 (dedicated FlowObjectModelHelper: ugly, but works) > > > > > > yuck! > > > So, what do we do? Carsten, may I have your blessing for adding helper > methods to ObjectModelHelper? I can even make interface out of > WebContinuation instead of concrete class! > Ok, first I will not prevent you from doing so.
It's ok to add the objects to the object model. But I still don't like adding helper methods to the ObjectModelHelper as this makes separating flow into a module/block near impossible or it will be an incompatible change. So I prefer making an own helper class for flow. *If* we later on come to the conclusion that it would be better (and working) to have the helpers in the ObjectModelHelper then we can move them without any pain. But again, if I'm the only one being against adding it to the ObjectModelHelper, well...do whatever you want, but be warned that I will put this on the table when we separate the flow stuff ;) Carsten
