Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2003 02:08, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 23/03/2003 15.25:

What do you think?

+1 for the source distro.


I agree, except...


As for the binary distro, we simply never did one really. What I'd like
to see is

cocoon-full.war


no need, IMHO.

BUT, a cocoon-sample.war would be great for "Introduction". I.e. Download that, drop it in your servlet container, and you have Cocoon's samples running. I'm sure "build process" scares away some users instinctively, especially the "life-without-a-compiler-windows-inflicted-mindset" (potential cocoon) users.
If we then have a page describing how to build the "samples", it would again lower the "perceived complexity" a bit, allowing the "newcomer" to build it to ease confidence. Call it "microstep learning", as it is the best way...

Hmmm, I was thinking about adding build profiles the other day.. something like:


./build.sh --profile=[profile] webapp

that will override the build properties from

[profile].properties

that include several different configuration properties that drive stuff like

 - inclusion/exclusion of stuff from the webapp
 - development/production version (debug on/off, security low/high)

and stuff like that.

What do you think?

Stefano.



Reply via email to