On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Stephan Michels wrote: > > >>>And then PURITY.txt? > >> > >>This is my try to get people into cleaning up their mess. > >> > >>It is the dump of the cut/paste discovery tool. Since it normally takes > >>5/6 hours to do a normal cut/paste discovery on coocon-dev, I left it > >>there so that people might realize how much *cut/paste* was done inside > >>Cocoon. > > > > > > What's the goal of this 'cut/paste discovery tool', I don't know it :-/ > > when you resort of doing cut/paste in your code is because your OO > design is bad and should be refactored. > > lack of cut/paste doesn't measure the quality of your object > orientation, but the amount of cut/paste tokens *DOES* measure the lack > of purity of your OO solutions. > > checkout > > http://pmd.sourceforge.net/cpd.html > > I'm normally not a great fan of automatic code metrics (the stuff that > Maven generates, is, IMHO, useless crap), but the PMD project has very > interesting ideas and CPD is one of them. Too bad is slow as hell! > > So, people, take a look at PURITY.txt and feel ashamed :) > > >>but I think nobody really cares. as for unit tests. which is a very bad > >>thing :/ > > > > > > So you don't have objections, if I add a test target for blocks ;-) > > No objection whatsoever!
Another question, we have a license file for 'maybeupload', but not a library for it? If there are no objections, I want to copy build.new.xml to build.xml. Do we still require build.old.xml? Stephan.
