On 24/3/03 8:44 pm, "Geoff Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 03:38 PM 3/24/2003, you wrote:
>> On 24/3/03 7:42 pm, "Leszek Gawron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it would be good to include AJP13 Listener in Jety config file
>> so one
>>> could use Apache frontend OOTB
>>
>> I am _strongly_ against this: the inclusion of Jetty in the Cocoon
>> distribution is an "enabler" for technology-showoff (you download cocoon,
>> and you run it, that's it)...
>>
>> The distribution of Jetty we include is a minimal one, a stripped down one,
>> _precisely_ because of that reason, I'm actually thinking, for that reason,
>> to strip out most of what we don't use from the jetty.jar we include...
>>
>> Pier
>
> And I've thought of suggesting renaming the jetty.jar to jetty-lite.jar or
> something like it, to make it really clear that it's not considered a
> deploy-ready version.
Well, the version we include _is_ the full Jetty JAR, but it currently
accounts for only 1/3 of the full Jetty distribution (which, for example,
includes support also for HTTPs, JDK 1.4 NIO, JMX and others).
If we strip out stuff from it, though, yes, I agree w/ you that it should be
called something like "jetty-lite-x.y.z.jar"
Pier
