On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > they represent the same stuff.
Not that there also is a repackaged version somewhere (edu.concurrent or something). > I tried to depend on 'dougLea' as the project name implied but > failed. I think it's a very bad habit to name the project name > different from the descriptor file. Ahh, trap #1. project != module. For a module that consists of a single project, I agree. Sometimes there may be historic reasons. The file ant.xml still contains a project named jakarta-ant, for example. I'm not sure about the dougLea file name. > No problem, I'm removing the dependecy right now. Thanks! Stefan
