Stephan Michels wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:


In the beginning, there was only one cocoon distribution, packaged with
two different packagers (zip for windows and tar.gz for unix and friends).

Then cocoon became very complex and we decided to create a binary
distribution to make things easier. Things were indeed easier for new
users to install and try out, but it was harder for them to actually
*do* something with cocoon and tune it for their needs.

The fact that there is even a sourceforge project about a 'clean'
version of our shipped cocoon WAR feels a little like a slap in our face.

Now, in the light of a cleaned-up build system and a
very-well-factored-out static block architecture and the inclusion of a
super light-weight servlet container, I think we are ready to finally go
back to where we started and stop releasing binaries.

Before you jump up and down and scream "no, no, binaries are easier for
our users", get off your
life-without-a-compiler-windows-inflicted-mindset and think that every
JDK comes with a compiler.


I can remind me that many users ask for a clean webapp.


To be really honest, Cocoon already includes not one but *TWO* java
compilers!!! we could build from javawebstart if we really wanted to!
(we should also decide if we want to remove pizza from the distribution!)

So, in light of the good old triad

./configure; make; make install


Only because of the fact that Cocoon have included two compilers, I do not
want to used them.


I propose to ship Cocoon 2.1 *AS IS*, sort of a cleaned-up version of
our current CVS and improve a little the 'INSTALL.txt' doc that will
suggest you to do


There are many things, which don't belong to a release like unfinished
blocks, scratchpad, and perhaps deprecated stuff...

no way. we release everything, it's up to you to use them. unfinished blocks and scratchpad are called so but they will be there for you to try and to ease building feedback on them. deprecated stuff will be needed for those people who depend on stuff that we changed (like the source, for example)


So I whould like a solution there we offer a source distribution, and
binary distribution with a war, which includes all samples, and one clean
war. So the user can first download the bin-dist, test all samples,
and experimentalize with the clean webapp. And then he is glad and want
more, he can download the source-dist.

I'm still strongly in favor of a single distribution with a very simple, short yet very well documented INSTALL.txt file.


Stefano.



Reply via email to