Le Jeudi, 27 mars 2003, à 13:52 Europe/Zurich, Diana Shannon a écrit :
...
I think a discussion intermixed with a vote changes the vote so that people end up voting on different issues -- with no clear cut result.
Agreed - in this particular case, the best thing might be to cancel the current vote and make a new proposal (taking into account the "cocoon-docs alias" stuff)?
This would make sure everyone's on the same wavelength before voting.
Steven, you started the original vote, what do you think?
It's good to see that the 'requirement' to vote adds some energy to the discussion, but then again, you, Diana & David are mostly right when suggesting that vote was premature and underspecified. I'm the hero of underspecification, but keep that silent. :-D
Personally, I find it difficult to follow the current discussion, so if somebody would be able to summarize (as a proposal), this will help (at least stupid me ;-)
Cheers,
</Steven> -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
