Hello all, I would like to see an official replay to Kevin's questions.
Thanks, Artur... > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin O'Neill > > I understand your point and agree with it. I would like to however ask > some follow up questions :). > > Say I'm building with cocoon 2.0.4 and there is a bug in the > foo. I fix > that bug in the version of coccon that I supply to my client. > Under normal > circumstances I would supply the client with the code (including third > party code, patched or not) of the product I'm working on. > Can I supply > the patched version? > > Now lets say that I enhance one of the existing components to > extend the > functionality in some way of the component (say allow for an addition > configuration option). Can I supply this version? > > What if I've submitted both enhancements as patches and they have been > excepted for the HEAD version? > > What if they haven't? > > > But defining an package and import it (or extend it) are > two entirely > > different things because they can't do any harm. > > I think this sort of stuff should be in a licensing FAQ. > > > Stefano.
