On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 02:50 PM, Geissel, Adrian wrote:
I've been watching this thread for a while now, and as a regular Cocoon power-user, I am keen to see a good forms framework.
Me too ...
One major issue I see .... maybe getting in the way of the discussion ....
An ideal forms framework is complicated by the fact that people need to do very different things ....
Here are examples of two obvious uses, and how they can differ:
Editing 'business' data
'forms' contain simple data types that need validating as data-types often require JavaBean etc. object mapping with business logic often require RDBMS etc. mapping for persistence
Editing XML Content
'forms' contain a mixture of simple data types and markup often need wysiwyg editing for the markup might need to transform form data from one MU language to another need to validate XML fragments need to roundtrip XML fragments between editor and server need to modify XML 'documents' on the server
IMHO, it is the differences between these typical needs, that is causing some of the misunderstandings between people who are currently discussing form frameworks.
hope this helps
regards Jeremy