Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

stefano 2003/04/03 06:16:32

Modified: src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/request
RequestFactory.java
Log:
removing fixmes and adding explainations


...

try {
ClassLoader loader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
Class clazz = loader.loadClass(className);
- factory = (RequestFactory)clazz.newInstance();
+ factory = (RequestFactory) clazz.newInstance();
} catch (Throwable t) {
- // FIXME (VG): Is it Ok to ignore all exceptions?
+ // the try/catch mechanism is used because there is no way
+ // to know if a classloader contains a class without asking for it
}


...

          if (factory == null) {
              factory = new SimpleRequestFactoryImpl();
          }


I think my comment was more about "Is it ok to return SimpleRequestFactoryImpl instead of requested factory (via paramater className) and not even print any warning about it".

Ah, well, you should have written that instead ;-)


no, seriously, in my local copy I'm removing the ability to have pluggable request factories and this is mostly because if you do, there is no way to make the upload facilities workable.

I've looked into the way the request factories work along with the environment and, well, it's a HUGE hack.

But I don't want to touch this before we release, so I'm making refactoring that doesn't alter the environment contracts (for now).

In the future, we really need to redesign the environment for better input friendlyness or we are doomed.

Anybody against this?

Stefano.




Reply via email to