Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> 
> But there is another reason for this mail: Now with the current XSLTC we 
> can switch to it as default processor in 2.0 too, can't we?
> 
I'm currently -1 on this because imho xsltc has not proven to be 100%
working and I think we should at least in 2.0.x have a fully working
xslt processor as default.

Carsten

Reply via email to