Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > But there is another reason for this mail: Now with the current XSLTC we > can switch to it as default processor in 2.0 too, can't we? > I'm currently -1 on this because imho xsltc has not proven to be 100% working and I think we should at least in 2.0.x have a fully working xslt processor as default.
Carsten