Torsten Knodt wrote: > Hello, > I'm currently working on my patchset of the week ;). One part > is a modularized > DirectoryGenerator. The only what is currently not included is the > XPathDirectoryGenerator. As it can simply be simulated by > XInclude, why > having the code doubled? Or have I understood something wrong > with this > thing?
Is it an issue that XPathDirectoryGenerator mixes concerns by traversing a file system and also parsing and extracting XML from files? This seems like a reasonable convenience to me, similar to the MP3/Image etc DirectoryGenerators. Also, is XPathDirectoryGenerator cachable? Because XIncludeTransformer currently isn't.
