Marc Portier wrote, On 28/05/2003 8.38:

Miles Elam wrote:
...
What is the purpose of resources if this new syntax goes into effect (which I like by the way)? What can a resource do that an overloaded pipeline element cannot?


I think as Stefano said (slightly rephrased): it would deprecate the use of resources that are only fragments of pipelines.

Then we are basically killing resources, as complete pipelines can already be used instead of resources.


...
Is this more then an issue of naming this concept?

I mean, if we make use of resources as callable full or partial sitemap snippets, what would we loose that we instead get from using this new concept?


--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to