Bruno says: > What exactly is the purpose of a tidy serializer again? I was fiddling around with Tidy and noticed that I couldn't get the <textarea/> problem solved with it.
[The <textarea/> problem: an empty textarea (<form><textarea/></div>) is serialized to <form><textarea></form> which results in a loss of everything below the textarea when rendered in the browser] So this leaves very little reasons for me to use a TidySerializer. Torsten, am I missing something? Have I forgotton why we needed it? What are your reasons to implement a TidySerializer? I'm sure I had my reasons to need the TidySerializer; but I simply forgot them. regards, Arje > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: 31 May 2003 11:07 > Posted To: Cocoon Dev List > Conversation: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20185] - [PATCH] TidySerializer > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20185] - [PATCH] TidySerializer > > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20185>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20185 > > [PATCH] TidySerializer > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-05-31 09:06 ------- > What exactly is the purpose of a tidy serializer again? > > If there are any problems with the current HTML serializers, > I'd rather see them > fixed then hidden behind an additional layer. >
