Upayavira > > On 13 Jun 2003 at 8:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > AFAIK, the only real thing missing for 2.1 is the FOM implementation. > > The question is now, is someone already working on it resp. should we > > wait for the release until it's finished? > > What is actually required to fix the FOM implementation? Is it > just refactoring some of > the main Cocoon classes to follow the FOM? If it isn't too hard, > I might try to find time > for some of it. > I think its refactoring and adding some functionality. As a starting point you can look at this thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105401789500001&r=1&w=2
Carsten
