> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Culshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 June 2003 18:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vote] FOM design methodology > > > I've considered using in in the past for a project and then > rejected it as being in the "api too unstable" basket.
Hah! I'm already using albeit a tiny example of it in production. > > Anything that ensures code that I cut now won't break later > and has more of a future gets my vote. > > [+1] small to big. > > [-1] big to small. > So likewise to save me future work! [+1] small to big. [-1] big to small. Christopher
