Geoff Howard wrote: > > At 02:20 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I think I found a showstopper for 2.1 :( : > >2.1 is not binary compatible to 2.0.x - if you compile a (sitemap) > >component using 2.0.x and put this into 2.1 it will in most cases > >fail to run. As a simple example, you can use the FileGenerator.class > >from 2.0.x. > > ... > > >So, the question is: do we want to have this kind of compatibility > >or do the users have to recompile (which works of course as we are > >compatible on the source level)? > > I think we'd have to poll the users list (and any large scale users > we know of that may not be on the list if we really want to be nice) > but if this is just a matter of recompiling, not recoding I don't > think that's too much to ask. > Yes, it's only recompiling - nothing more (well, at least in theory :) )
Carsten