> 2) small to big
+1 from me
Ricardo Rocha wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1) big to small -> give users all possible freedom and restrict that freedom once we understand potentially problematic usages.
2) small to big -> give users the least possible freedom based on some required functionality and grow as the users express their needs.
+1 for big to small
But this *must* be an error ;-)
Sure it is, shom! :-)
So I stand corrected:
+1 for small to big
The FOM design that was proposed by myself and Ricardo follows methodology #2.
Joerg
