Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Jeff Turner wrote, On 24/06/2003 13.38: > > > As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting > > that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the > consensus being it > > "makes sense". > > > > AFAICT the only practical difference would be that Cocoon committers > > would automatically become Forrest committers. Sounds fine to me. Can > > we vote on these issues then? > > > > Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers > > +1 > +1
> > Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon > > (http://cocoon.apache.org/forrest) > > +1 > +1 > </SNIP> > > PS: This makes me think that Linotype should have its own project rather > than being just a block... > I think some other current blocks are good candidates as subprojects but I guess we are not ready for that now - I think, this fits a little bit in the context of "real blocks". Carsten
