To David's question: I don't have an ant reference, but I don't think there's a way to do that and still do the entity include. That's why the resource Joerg pointed to exists I'd guess. You can't have entities point to the children of the root node by some magic I'm not aware of, can you??
At 04:18 AM 6/27/2003, Joerg wrote:
May I point to http://www.ct42.de/en/ch02.html?
Joerg
Why, yes you may! - Just curious - why is this not in ant itself? Is that what the "integration in ant" page is about? If that's a goal, perhaps we could help move it in that direction? - Does someone (Joerg?) have experience using this? - This seems like it would be pretty "invasive" in the sense that every target would need to get touched if only to prefix the module name to the beginning of the depends targets. Is that overly invasive given that beta is right around the corner?
Seems to me though that this is what we "need" - anyone else have other ideas?
Geoff
David Crossley wrote:On 2003-03-30, Geoff Howard wrote:
Is there any strategy for making the xml fragments in src/targets well-formed so editors don't barf on them?
That sounds like a good idea and makes me itch. What do you think needs to be done? Is it just that the multiple <target> elements need to be wrapped in a container element? --David
