On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:01:26AM +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le Mercredi, 19 f�v 2003, � 08:45 Europe/Zurich, Jeff Turner a �crit : > > >...So I agree with Diana about moving all docs to the Wiki. It seems > >the > >best long-term solution, avoiding all the problems that a dual > >wiki/xdoc > >system would cause. > > I tend to agree but OTOH there must be some way for users to find out > about the reliability of a document. > > Currently, I think the xdocs are viewed are "official" whereas the wiki > is more like "melting pot" - the difference is easy, even though the > good quality of many wiki docs makes it more blurred in practice. > > So I think, if in the future all docs are done on a wiki, some form of > metadata/review system is required so that the state and validity of a > particular document is clearly visible.
Agreed. Perhaps just a section at the top of each page for "Reviewed by <author> at <date>" declarations? Another bit of important metadata is the Cocoon version (2.0.x or 2.1) that the doc applies to. --Jeff > -Bertrand > >
