On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > Could we add a binary version of Forrest (including Cocoon binaries) to > > our CVS repository so that everyone can generate the docs reliably from > > the same version of Forrest, using it as a blackbox tool? +1 > > That would mean we would have to download cocoon "twice"?! Yes, one that has been tested and work, and one that hopyfully work ;-) > I am -1 for inclusion in the cocoon repository as binary. > > But I am +10 for building cocoon from source and the use *that* > version to generate the docs. As Steven(?) already pointed > out: a very good testcase. How do you maintain that? Do you always run through the stylesheets and diff like hell, if something was fixed or improved? I like more the version that Forrest generate the docs, and the Cocoon standard dist the samples. It's more SoC, I think ;-) Stephan.
