Diana Shannon wrote, On 21/03/2003 12.52:
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 05:57 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
But I am +10 for building cocoon from source and the use *that* version to generate the docs. As Steven(?) already pointed out: a very good testcase.
Yes, but is it the "concern" of cocoon-doc contributors to test Forrest? Sorry, I don't think so. We need a docs-generation system that is reliable, so those who want to help don't have to first figure out why the docs generation system is broken before they can contribute.
Gump is for tests, or even Forrestbot when we restart autoupdate.
Let's not put the burden of suffering onto those that do not fix it (doc developers).
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------