On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 01:11 PM, Tony Collen wrote:

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Page: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=Tutorials , version: 26 on Thu Apr 3 17:57:58 2003 by TonyCollen

<snip/>

+ You might want to check [HowTos] for info contained within this Wiki.

I'm trying to remove the overlap between the notion of a Tutorial and How-To.

Do you mean reinforce the distinctions between a How-To and a Tutorial? I agree with what you did.


Most of the links on Tutorials were third-party, offsite links.
There were 2 How-To's linked, that weren't on the actual [HowTos] page, so
I moved them to ther from [Tutorials].

I

Page: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=Snippets , version: 17 on Thu Apr 3 17:41:03 2003 by TonyCollen

- IMO most of this should be classified as FAQs. This content could probably be moved to [FAQs] -- [TonyCollen]
? --------------------------------------------


+ IMO most of this could probably be moved to [FAQs] -- [TonyCollen]

Any big objections to moving the content on [Snippets] to [FAQs] ? We could lose the [Snippets] page altogether and get rid of some cruft.

I have no objections. It was created as a separate category originally with the idea that snippets would be displayed in a textarea box, where they could be readily copied. This is no longer necessary, now that we have wiki where such copies are simply a matter of clicking "Edit this Page".


However, what do you mean by the term "cruft". Let's be careful here. Even though we are using this for our documentation system, some people inevitable will have the wiki perception that major edits are rude. So, let's be thoughtful about removing cruft. Do you mean you are removing links from the index to certain pages you consider cruft?


Page: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=HowTos , version: 84 on Thu Apr 3 17:53:27 2003 by TonyCollen

- Quick HOW-TO documents to get to grips with particular chunks of functionality.
? -


+ Quick HOW-TO documents to get to grips with particular chunks of functionality (In strict alphabetical order)

Suddenly, I think this page is a lot easier to scan. Thoughts?

Definitely better if your language is alphabetized like English ;-). Still, I think the term "Basic" is too broad, now that we have so many How-Tos. I promise to take a stab at it over the weekend.


Diana



Reply via email to