Page: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FOM_cookie , version: 2 on Thu 
Jun 19 09:43:34 2003 by ReinhardPoetz

+ *__cookie.name__
+ *__cookie.version__
- NONE
- 


Page: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FOM_Cocoon , version: 4 on Thu 
Jun 19 09:56:22 2003 by ReinhardPoetz

- __Session getSession()__\\
- NOTE(SM/RR): ''both Ricardo and I believe that the flow should always be 
associated with a Session. Thus the use of the semantics "getSession" instead 
of "createSession". We are, in fact, against the concept of having the flow 
behave differently we the session has been created or it's has not been. This 
implicit behavior is potentially very dangerous from a user perspective and 
should be avoided.
- Moreover, it has been pointed out how continuations can be see as a way to 
"extend" sessions rather than replacing them. This would allow us to reuse the 
session-handling machinery already in place for things like load-balancing and 
fault-tollerance.''
- __void callAction(name,map)__\\
?   ^^^^

+ __Map callAction(name,map)__\\
?   ^^^

+ 
+ __Session getSession()__\\
+ NOTE(SM/RR): ''both Ricardo and I believe that the flow should always be 
associated with a Session. Thus the use of the semantics "getSession" instead 
of "createSession". We are, in fact, against the concept of having the flow 
behave differently we the session has been created or it's has not been. This 
implicit behavior is potentially very dangerous from a user perspective and 
should be avoided.
+ Moreover, it has been pointed out how continuations can be see as a way to 
"extend" sessions rather than replacing them. This would allow us to reuse the 
session-handling machinery already in place for things like load-balancing and 
fault-tollerance.''
+ 
+ Note(RP): ''I removed it in favour of the session object as property of the 
cocoon object.''
- NOTE(SM/RR): ''the absence of the context object is intentional! we couldn't 
come up with a reasonable need for such an object at the flow level. So, for 
the principle of 'less is more', we don't consider it. Be aware that if you 
want to propose its addition, you have to come up with a reason for it.''
- 


Reply via email to