> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael McKibben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [C2] easy Q: about pipelines
> 
> 
> Hello, I have a (dare I say 'dumb'?) question regarding pipelines defined
> in the sitemap. What is the difference between defining one pipeline (with
> a whole bunch of match elements) and several pipelines (with the same
> match elements in total, but spread across several pipeline elements). For
> example, consider the following:
> 
> sitemap1 (one pipeline):
> ...
> <map:pipelines>
>       <map:pipeline>
>               <map:match pattern="url1">
>                       <map:generate src="docs/file1.xml"/>
>                       <map:transform src="xsl/site.xsl"/>
>                       <map:serialize type="html"/>
>               </map:match>
>               <map:match pattern="url2">
>                       <map:generate src="docs/file2.xml"/>
>                       <map:transform src="xsl/site.xsl"/>
>                       <map:serialize type="html"/>
>               </map:match>
>               <map:match pattern="url3">
>                       <map:generate src="docs/file3.xml"/>
>                       <map:transform src="xsl/site.xsl"/>
>                       <map:serialize type="html"/>
>               </map:match>
>       </map:pipeline>
> </map:pipelines>
> ...
> 
> sitemap2 (several pipelines):
> ...
> <map:pipelines>
>       <map:pipeline>
>               <map:match pattern="url1">
>                       <map:generate src="docs/file1.xml"/>
>                       <map:transform src="xsl/site.xsl"/>
>                       <map:serialize type="html"/>
>               </map:match>
>       </map:pipeline>
> 
>       <map:pipeline>
>               <map:match pattern="url2">
>                       <map:generate src="docs/file2.xml"/>
>                       <map:transform src="xsl/site.xsl"/>
>                       <map:serialize type="html"/>
>               </map:match>
>       </map:pipeline>
> 
>       <map:pipeline>
>               <map:match pattern="url3">
>                       <map:generate src="docs/file3.xml"/>
>                       <map:transform src="xsl/site.xsl"/>
>                       <map:serialize type="html"/>
>               </map:match>
>       </map:pipeline>
> </map:pipelines>
> 
> It seems to me that both forms are equivalent. So I guess my question is
> 'Why would one choose one form over the other?' Is it just to define
> seperate "handle-errors" processing on a per pipeline basis? Thanks in

Yes.

Vadim

> advance for your input.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --mike
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to