I totally agree in principle, however, I work in a tightly controlled
environment where such decisions are not mine to make!
I'll keep trying to find a way around the problem.
Regards,
Anthony Aldridge
Lead Application developer
Managed Intranet Hosting
CSC
JPMorganChase
Personal GDP: 325-8338
MIH Hotline: 876-1300
Gregory Steuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/10/2001 18:42:43
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Cocoon2 with no batik at all.
>>>>> "aaldridg" == aaldridg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
aaldridg> If I manage to solve the problem, I'll get back to you,
aaldridg> if not - has anyone got a solution - no way I can
aaldridg> install X on our servers.
You should consider installing Xvfb. Properly protected Xvfb
(i.e. with tcp port filtered out by the host firewall) is not a threat
to the system security.
Don't get me wrong, getting rid of the dependency is much better, but
if I had to choose between scrapping the work I've done to move my
application and installing and running Xvfb I would choose the latter.
And yes, I used to run Xvfb for months to automate InstallAnywhere
builds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
