> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2001 2:17 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fastest Platform (softwarewise)?
> 
> 
> Phil Blake wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We run apache/tomcat/cocoon on 3 server platforms, Linux, 
> AIX and MacOS
> > X.
> > 
> > Linux on a dual PIII 550, OSX on a PPC-G4 450 and AIX on a 4x250MHz
> > PPC-G3.
> > 
> > Bang for buck, a G4 running OSX wins hands down. However, 
> believe it or
> > not, the dual PIII comes in second (AIX don't come close... too
> > expensive for real consideration and Windows is not a 
> server operating
> > system in practice, only in marketing).
> 
> That's interesting, I didn't think OSX would come out on 
> top--maybe second
> though.  As to AIX, and this goes for Solaris as well, they are very
> expensive--so bang for the buck goes down.  How about raw performance
> though?  Which comes out on top?
> 
> > The Dual PIII was about 10% more than the G4 (after adding SCSI) and
> > about 70-80% the performance.
> 
> So for 10% more cost you gain 70-80% more speed.  That is a reasonable
> tradeoff.  What kinds of tests did you run?  How does each one scale
> (as you add more clients).  How many simultaneous connections can each
> platform handle before you reach saturation?

I don't think they ment that it was 70-80% *better*.  I think that it was
70-80% of the original performance :{

> > Although theory has it that a G4 500MHz has about the same 
> performance
> > as a PIII 1.5GHz (ie triple the performance), I've found that it's
> > really more like double the performance, not triple.
> 
> Careful there.  Clockrate != performance.  When all things are equal
> (i.e. chip architecture, design, etc.), then clockrate is effective
> to determine relative performance increases.  However, the G4 and the
> PIII have very different architectures.  This is true of the PIII and
> the P4, and the P4 and the K7.  In that case 1.5GHz in all three
> processors would have very different performance results.  As far as
> I know, the G4 is not capable of the high clockrates, so it makes up
> for it with an efficient pipeline.  The pentium series was designed
> for high clockrates.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 


=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to