> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 02:53 pm, you wrote: > > having code within your XSP page that reads XML from some external source > > (outside the page) and outputting it > > > > > > Seems to me like that type of code is best done as a separate generator of > > its own. > > > > Others agree? disagree? > > I agree. I only use XSP for instances where I want to use logicsheets. > Otherwise I use the file generator if I want to sent a plain XML document > that is on disk. > > For data from other sources, I've been moving towards making java objects > that are XMLizable, and having a generator that just calls .toSAX on them. > -pete
Maybe a stupid question... but: why? Do you really gain in performance, or in architecture design? (I mean comparing this to <util:include-file> from XSP or Xinclude) - Tomas * Tomás Espeleta - http://www.digival.es * ---------------------------------------------------- * Those who know don't talk. * Those who talk don't know. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
