>> Up to now I have used sessions to store objects needed further down the >> processing chain. I may be mistaken, but this approach seems to be a lot >> more efficient, assuming I don't need the object outside of the chain... Is >> this correct? > > I'd say no. For me the primary issue is holding onto unneeded data - which > could be GC'd much earlier if you stored it in a request object.
I agree with you. I wasn't specific enough in my prose as to what I meant by "approach" (meaning storage in request attribute NOT session). Thanks for your clarification and sorry for any confusion. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
