I do think this is one of the flaws of axkit - lack of documentation, though the developpers are extremely helpful. When I initially looked at axkit I only saw that it worked with PIs. The only way I found out was bad-mouthing it and being corrected - not a good way to do documentation... :)
Perhaps this has changed (with it on apache) and it is worth another look? best, -Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Royal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:21 AM Subject: Re: Cocoon vs AxKit > On Thursday 17 January 2002 10:05 am, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > It's the other way around: AxKit is much more akin to Cocoon2. We had a > > sitemap concept before they did, and while we still allow xml-stylesheet > > PI's, it's not using the Cocoon1 reactor pattern that is so difficult to > > oops, my bad. AxKit had more power under the hood than I realized :) I only > ever used PI's to direct the flow. > -pete > > -- > peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please check that your question has not already been answered in the > FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
