I've got a diofferent opinion. I've done technical docu for several years: the criterion of measurement of a docu is its user! Thus, if I assure you that we read the stuff through and through, there are only two alternative interpretations: either that we are as dumb as hell, and that we'd better leave our fingers off a tool as blinking and glistening as Cocoon, or that the docu has to be enhanced for dummies like us, be it a time-consuming thing or not. Nothing inbetween, as far as I know.
Feel free to choose the alternative... ;-) Matthias -----Original Message----- From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AW: Problems with font embedding On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Adnan Zelkanovic wrote: > of course, I have read it many times. > Why do you want me to read the docu again although you know that its > "out-of-date" ? > If the developers don't want to be asked the same questions again and again > then they > have to write a better docu which is "up-to-date" and which can be > understood by everyone ! > > Sorry, but that's the fact. ...don't want to butt in here. But as a matter of fact docu *will* and *cannot* be up-to-date when a software is still being developed. But if you don't use the latest development version the docu should be ok and help... Cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
