On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > From: "Torsten Curdt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Is it possible that FOP uses the URIResolver of Cocoon instead, in order > to > > > understand pseudo-protocol (especially cocoon:// and resource://) ? > > > > > > Is there a trick in order to use relative paths in FOP? (I read the > > > archives and everyone > > > seems to use full URLs :-( > > > > IIRC there is a static configuration in FOP where you can specify a > > context directory. Unfortunately this not yet configurable in the > serializer and > > since it's static it will be for each FOP tasks... > > > > Maybe you can post this issue on the FOP list and help make this better > > configurable... > > FOP community is in the process of making this happen, by using Avalon > Configuration. > If you want to partecipate, goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
great news :) -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
