Yeah lets definitely see that. G 1.0.4 should work. Not sure what in them that is choking it because the serializer ignores tags that it doesn't understand. So far G 1.0.4 works fine for me. Some people are excited when the next version of Gnumeric comes out.....I'm usually scared ;-)
Seth Ladd wrote: >On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 17:46, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >>I'm on RHL 7.2, kernel 2.4.17/2.4.9-RH, JDK 1.3.1, Tomcat 4.0.1/4.0.4b2, >>Have Gnumeric 1.0.4. Do the samples not work? Can you open a bug and >>attach defective sheets and/or the xml/xsl you're using to generate it. >>Are any exceptions thrown? Version of Excel? (97+ is required) >> > >Actually, the samples work fine. It's sheets generated by gnumeric >1.0.4 that don't work. It's ok for me, since I'll be generating my >sheets from another XML file. I eventually found a schema that >generated correct Excel files. (I had to remove much "extraneous" info >from the file generated by gnumeric) > >I'll open a bug and attach the offending gnumeric file. I didn't see >any immediate exceptions, but I didn't look hard for them. I was also >using Excel 2000. > >Thanks for your help! >Seth > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >Please check that your question has not already been answered in the >FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
