Frank Taffelt wrote:
> it seems that new MODDB Actions doesn't alway's process the tables in the
> right order.
>
> In my understanding the processorder of the tables is determined by their
> order in the table-set element.
> Under some circumstances this order is violated.
Mmmh, no. They are processed in table definition order. Always. Should
have been documented, I think. It stems from the fact that you could use
the action without any table-set -- then all tables would be used. This
is a) because the actions started as a patche :-) of the original
actions and b) for compatibility with them.
I agree, that it is desireable to control the order data is inserted.
Actually, it would make the setup even easier.
So, no its not a bug but a feature. Anyway, if no one objects I'm happy
to change that behaviour. I reckon that no-one relies on working without
table-sets anyway.
Chris.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
