Sebastien,
I would advise you to reconsider your viewpoint. You are suggesting that by sending HTML3.2 you gain the advantage of fewer bytes; I disagree. If you want to save bandwidth, XHTML is what you need. That's because it's modular. You can move most of presentation-related info to a cascading stylesheet, which will make downloads faster (stylesheets are reusable and browsers tend to cash them). Also, there are more things than download time; how about rendering time? Your 'fewer bytes' advantage turns zero if the browser has to go through figuring out what the crippled (by today's standards) markup means to render the page. I would consider using the XHTML basic DTD if you need something really compact and simple. And there's always whitespace stripping. Cheers, Manos > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastien SACARD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 'optimised HTML' serialiser > > > Hi, > > In a production environment, it's important to have 'optimised HTML' > (without quotes, without spaces, etc ...) in order to lower > the number > of bytes to the end user. This question sounds a little > silly, but does > anyone know a transformer or a serialiser that produces such HTML ? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please check that your question has not already been answered in the > FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
